For global warming
there are two competing truisms. The first truism is that the most efficient
and effective means of reducing carbon emissions is through a carbon tax. The
basic economic rule is that people buy less of something when it’s more
expensive. And a tax on carbon would make all things reliant on carbon
emissions—gasoline, electricity, etc.—more expensive. Folks would buy less of
this stuff and there would be less carbon thrown into the air.
The
most common approach around carbon taxes is levying them on industries that are
heavy users of fossil fuels, mostly the electric utilities, with the increased
costs passed on to consumers. These taxes can be finessed, with rebates going
to lower income individuals to mitigate their hardship from these taxes. A good
thing about a carbon tax is that the revenue can be used to promote cleaner and
greener energy options.
The
other truism is that people hate to pay taxes. It doesn’t matter what sort of
tax it might be, an income tax, a carbon tax, a sales, tax, folks hate to pay
taxes.
We
just saw the clash of these truisms play themselves out in Australia, where the
recent elections delivered a whopping blow to the Labor Party that had been in
power for the past six years. The new Prime Minister-elect, Tony Abbott,
proclaimed in his acceptance speech that one of his prime objectives once he is
in office is an end to Australia’s carbon tax.
Down
under the carbon tax has not been around a long time, only about a year. In its
short life it proved to be, as with all taxes, unpopular. It was one of the
issues that Abbott used to hammer the Labor Party in his campaigning.
This
was not a single-issue election. The Labor Party might have been voted out
anyway. In power, the Labor Party was unstable and prone to internal bickering,
although their popularity increased when Kevin Rudd, who had been Prime
Minister from 2007 to 2010, replaced Prime Minister Julia Gillard in something
of an internal party coup in the past few months.
The
death of Australia’s carbon tax is nonetheless disconcerting. The planet, and
humanity, will be in a lot better shape if human beings reduce their use of
fossil fuels, but we’re not going to magically do that sort of thing without
being prodded to do so. Despite the good that a carbon tax might be able to do
for us, we just don’t like being prodded.
No comments:
Post a Comment