Showing posts with label CPAC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CPAC. Show all posts

Saturday, March 8, 2014

CPAC = Big Crazy, At Least Where the Environment Is Concerned


photo Reuters



It looks like the darling of this year’s Conservative Political Action Conference, in what is an apparent flirtation with the GOP presidential nomination, was Rand Paul, the son of Ron Paul and, like his father, a firebrand libertarian.
            Paul’s message of less and less government has some staying power for this conference. The Kentucky Senator was similarly lauded at last year’s CPAC. As the way things are going for Appalachians, I have little hope that things will change for the better in those states. They can continue to expect toxic spills in their rivers. With a Rand Paul administration, however, that dismal future would be a certainty. For him, the companies that mine coal can pretty much do as they please, and he dismisses mountaintop removal by saying, “I don’t’ think that anyone is going to be missing a hill or two here and there.”
            Looking at some of the other things to come out of CPAC, it certainly seems like a lot of Big Crazy is going on there. Here we have William Peter Pendly, author of Sagebrush Rebel: Reagan's Battle with Environmental Extremists and Why It Matters Today speaking on president Obama’s fictitious “war on fossil fuels.” Later in the video someone in on the panel discussion dismisses concern or action on climate change by saying that there is a “prejudice against the man-made,” due to “human racism.” That, in essence, folks who are concerned about melting glaciers, rising oceans, possible worsening weather events such as drought, floods, and more sever storms, are only concerned because of their prejudice against the human race. Is that Big Crazy or what?


Friday, March 22, 2013

Rand Paul: Mountaintop Removal Is Just "Missing a Hill Or Two Here and There"


Hot off his revival of the Senate tradition of filibustering for hours and hours over the administration’s foreign, and possibly domestic, drone strike policy, Rand Paul took the number one slot as their presidential choice in 2016 at the recent Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) held in DC last week.
When he speaks about mountaintop removal, Paul couches his approval of the mining practice in terms of property rights, which are, along with their ideas of “small government” and their views of the U.S. Constitution, one of the sacrosanct components for the libertarians' utopia. For Paul, if a coal company owns land, they can mine it any which way they want to. Of the destruction of Kentucky’s landscape caused by mountaintop removal, he goes on to say, “I don’t’ think that anyone is going to be missing a hill or two here and there.” And that’s pretty much it, when it comes to Rand Paul’s take on mountaintop removal.
            It makes my head spin that anybody who talks like this could be seriously considered for any public office, let alone the presidency of the United States. Is it that Paul has been so blinded by the vacuously constructed Ayn Rand view of the world that he simply believes that one of the most destructive mining practices the world knows is allowed because a coal company owns a plot of land? Or is Paul simply using the rhetoric of one of the extreme ends of the GOP to give cover to the mountaintop removal mining companies?
            A lot of folks at CPAC want him to be the next president. How crazy is that?


Just "missing a hill or two here and there." The mining operation close to Whitesburg, Kentucky, the state that Rand Paul represents in the Senate. photo from mountainroadshow.com