In Maury County, Tennessee yesterday, at a meeting convened to address citizens’ concerns over
the quality of their drinking water, an official of the Tennessee Department of
Environment and Conservation said to residents, “We
take water quality very seriously. Very, very seriously. But you need to make
sure that when you make water quality complaints, you have a basis, because
federally, if there's no water quality issues, that can be considered under
Homeland Security an act of terrorism
[Italics mine].”
Sherwin
Smith is the Deputy Director of the TDEC’s division of water resources, and
what he said to this group of concerned citizens is, in a large sense, true. If
someone were to put poison in the aqueducts that bring Colorado River water to
southern California, threatening the lives of millions, that could most
certainly be considered terrorism. Correspondingly, if someone were to make the
threat of poisoning the aqueducts or to make the false claim that they had done
so, spreading fear and panic, under current law that could be considered
terrorism as well.
Smith,
however, was not speaking to representatives from al Quaida hell bent on
dropping anthrax into the local water tower. He was speaking to the Statewide
Organization for Community eMpowerment, a civic group that had been working
with Maury County residents to address water quality complaints. Some county
residents have complained about cloudy, odd-tasting water for years. In recent
months children have become ill; some say it’s because of bad tap water.
Industry,
some GOP politicians, and right wing rhetors have been quick to label folks
that get in the way of industry as terrorist or eco-terrorists. Examples are
here and here. And the FBI as made it easy to blur the line and label minor offenses as terrorism. This is the first time that I’ve run across a state government
official doing the same. It’s seems to me that it was just his way of telling
this group to shut up, to intimidate the citizens who showed up for this
meeting. In this way, he is using this rhetoric of terrorism just as industry
and right wingers do, as a verbal cudgel.
It’s
difficult enough to make a complaint to government officials. People should not
have to fear that they will somehow be considered in league with Ted Kaczynski
or Osama bin Laden if they call up someone at the water department to say that
their tap water is cloudy and tastes funny. And considering that extractive
industries are quick to attack those who question or criticize practices, it
could be a facile tactic on the part of the oil and gas industry to pick op the
ball from Sherwin Smith and label the folks who say that their wells have been
fouled by fracking as nothing but a bunch of terrorists.
No comments:
Post a Comment