Showing posts with label Kentuckians for the Commonwealth. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kentuckians for the Commonwealth. Show all posts

Saturday, August 24, 2013

This Week a Mixed Bag of Court Rulings For Mountaintop Removal


UPDATE BELOW

As far as the court rulings go, it’s a mixed bag for the mountains and the people of Appalachia this week. Some good news, some not so good news.
            First the bad news. In Kentucky a judge ruled against the Sierra Club and other environmental organizations who had brought suit to block a permit for a valley fill that the Army Corps of Engineers had granted for a mountaintop removal coal mining operation in the eastern part of the state.
            When folks challenge the legality of these permits, they usually concentrate on the environmental harm that the mountaintop mining operation will bring to the hills, valleys, and streams of Appalachia, but in this case, the first to do so, the environmental groups said that the Corps had not considered the negative health effects that the valley fill would have on local residents.
            The judge, Thomas B. Russell, ruled in favor of the coal company, Leeco Coal, finding that the Corps did “not act unreasonably” and “adequately analyzed the issues” in issuing the permit. I’m uncertain if judge Russell considered the growing evidence that living around mountaintop strip mining is hazardous to your health. Had he done so, he probably would have ruled otherwise.
            In another courtroom, this one in West Virginia, a judge ruled that a coal industry friendly law that was recently passed by the coal industry friendly legislature of West Virginia did not protect coal companies from lawsuits brought against the mining companies because of the pollution from their mines.
Coal River Mountain Watch had brought suit against Alpha Natural Resources, saying that discharges from the coal company’s Brushy Fork coal slurry impoundment bring about excessive selenium levels downstream, in violation of environmental regulation.

 
The Brushy Fork coal slurry impoundment. So big it would dwarf the Eiffel Tower

Last year’s legislation allows coal companies to declare that they are in compliance with West Virginia water pollution standards if they meet certain discharge limits for chemicals specified in their permits. The water pollution permit for Brushy Fork does not specifically limit selenium discharges, despite West Virginia’s separate water quality standard.
            Judge Robert C. Chambers, in his 36-page ruling, said that this shielding law does not provide Alpha Natural Resources protection from enforcement from existing state and federal laws that allow citizens to bring suit against polluting companies.
           There you have it. One victory, one defeat for the mountains and people of Appalachia.

UPDATE: 9/4/13 There is some hope in the Leeco case in Kentucky. On appeal of its case to a higher court, a District Court issued an order  for Leeco to cease its operation of a mountaintop coal mine while the plaintiffs, Kentuckians For the Commonwealth, the Sierra Club, and Earthjustice, appeal their case to the Sixth Circuit Court.

Friday, October 19, 2012

Appalachians: Should They Be Treated Like Americans?


The Sierra Club, along with Kentuckians for the Commonwealth and the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, are suing to have the approvals for mountaintop removal mines in Kentucky and West Virginia reversed
            The groups contend that the Army Corps of Engineers did not consider the detrimental effects the mining would have on the health of the local residents. By law health concerns are part of the permitting process.
            There is growing evidence that there is nothing healthy about living near a mountaintop mine. Health investigations have found learning disabilities, kidney stones, tooth loss, diarrhea, rash, and some forms of cancer in individuals living close to Mountaintop mines.[i] Mountaintop removal has also been associated with birth defects of the circulatory, respiratory, central nervous musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, and urogenital systems.[ii] And people who live around this destructive mining practice also experience extreme psychological stress.[iii]
            Considering that the people of Appalachia are our fellow Americans, how much of a stretch is it to think that they should be safeguarded by the same laws that keep the rest of us safe and healthy?


[i] Holzman, David C. “Mountaintop Removal Mining.” Environmental Health Perspectives Vol. 119, Issue 11 November 1, 2011 electronic journal
[ii] Ahearn, Melissa M. et at. “The association between mountaintop mining and birth defects among live births in central Appalachia, 1996–2003.” Environmental Research Vol. 111 Issue 6. Aug 2011, p 838-846 electronic journal
[iii] Paige Cordial, Ruth Riding-Malon, and Hilary Lips. Ecopsychology. Vol.4, Issue 3, September 2012, 201-208. electronic journal