More Bad News If You're a Fish: Mountaintop Removal Is Not Good For You

Although I’ve never been a sport fisherman, one of the things I remember from growing up in West Virginia was the enthusiasm so many of my friends and neighbors had for fishing. Lake fishing and trout fishing were a big deal, with lots of folks out on their boats or standing in their waders waiting for that next strike.

            Well, there is some new research out that demonstrates that mountaintop removal jeopardizes this pastime. Rivers and streams affected by mountaintop mining have only about a third as many fish as rivers and streams that have not been affected by the massive mining technique. Affected streams also have fewer than half as many species of fish than unaffected streams. These are the findings of research conducted by the U.S. Geological Survey. The title of the paper, published this week in the journal Freshwater Science, is Temporal changes in taxonomic and functional diversity of fish assemblages downstream from mountaintop mining.

            Some of the data used in the study was collected between 1999 and 2001 by a team from Pennsylvania State University. The USGS collected data for the study from 2010 to 2011. Other recent research had also found fish populations to be negatively affected by mountaintop removal.[i] And still other research found a link between the surface mining of coal and the extirpation of stream benthic organisms.[ii] To me, this research just points out the obvious. Anybody who has spent time around the sulfurous streams around surface mines will tell you that you won’t find many fish in them, and sometimes not much other life, either.

            As with other studies, this scientific work found heightened levels of selenium in the mining affected streams. Previous research, mandated by state legislation in West Virginia, found that high levels of selenium in streams were associated with deformities of fish larvae. In streams with especially high levels of selenium up to 20 percent of some fish species had deformities. This research dovetails with the USGS findings. If a lot of your offspring have deformities, a lot of those deformed offspring will not make it to maturity.

            How much more research is needed to convince people that mountaintop removal is harmful? I fear that nothing besides the depletion of all the viable coal seam in Appalachia will bring about the end to large coal companies blowing up our beautiful mountains. The paper’s press release from the USGS is here. And a hat tip to Ken Ward and his Coal Tattoo blog where I found out about this scientific study.

---

[i] Hopkins, Robert L., and Jordan C. Roush. "Effects Of Mountaintop Mining On Fish Distributions In Central Appalachia." Ecology Of Freshwater Fish 22.4 (2013): 578-586. Environment Complete. Web. 27 Sept. 2013

[ii] Cormier, Susan M., et al. "Assessing Causation Of The Extirpation Of Stream Macroinvertebrates By A Mixture Of Ions." Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry 32.2 (2013): 277-287. Environment Complete. Web. 3 July 2014.

Eight Arrested As They Protest Mountaintop Removal

This just in: Eight individuals were arrested today as they protested against mountaintop removal at the headquarters of Alpha Natural Resources, one of the mining companies that engages in mountaintop mining. Alpha is headquartered outside of Bristol Virginia. The protesters are members of Mountain Justice and Radical Action for Mountain People’s Survival (RAMPS). Members of RAMPS and Mountain Justice sometimes show up in the news for their acts of civil disobedience to defend the mountains.

            A court date was set for Monday. The protesters face charges of trespassing, obstructing free passage, disorderly conduct, and violation of fire codes. There is no word as to the charges Alpha might face for destroying mountains.

Mountaintop Removal Comes to China

Just as industrialists and manufacturers have moved their operations from the U.S. to China, it looks as though we’ve also sent mountaintop removal from Appalachia over to China as well.

            According to this article in the International Business Times, the effort to flatten mountains in China resembles that of what has occurred in Kentucky, West Virginia and other mountain states in the eastern U.S., at least in terms of scale. Hundreds of mountains are being flattened by the Chinese, with the resulting rock and dirt being deposited in adjacent valleys, just as they do in Appalachia.

            The difference is that coal is not the object of this effort. What the Chinese are after is flatland, more room for what China is known for: people, people, and more people. Mountains close to cities, such as Chongqing, Shiyan, and Lanzhou are being cleared away for development. Outside the city of Yan’an in the Shaanxi province they are flattening around 30 square miles; that’s about the size of Manhattan Island.

            Of course there are environmental concerns. Time will tell if the Chinese take better care of their valleys, rivers, and people than we have in Appalachia. 

Judge Rules For the Rivers and Streams of West Virginia

The science has been in for some time now, that the surface mining of coal, particularly the large-scale plundering that is mountaintop removal, increases conductivity in adjacent streams. As of today, a federal judge has ruled that increased conductivity resulting from mountaintop removal is damaging streams in West Virginia.

            Citing what he said was “extensive scientific evidence,” U.S. District Judge Robert C. Chambers ruled that mines owned by Alpha Natural Resources in Boone and Nicholas counties have “caused or materially contributed to a significant adverse impact” to streams near to the mountaintop mines. The judge said that the discharge from the mines had altered the chemistry of the streams and left them “unquestionably biologically impaired,” with the abundance of aquatic life “profoundly reduced.”

            The case, brought by the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy and the Sierra Club, was heard in the U.S. District Court in Huntington, West Virginia and augured on the increased conductivity of stream water that is caused by the surface mining of coal, particularly mountaintop removal.

As the term implies, conductivity is the ability of an electrical current to pass through water. Water that has high conductivity usually contains inorganic dissolved solids, such as chlorides, nitrates, sulfates, and phosphates, as well as sodium, magnesium, calcium, iron, and aluminum. Most stream water will have these substances at some level, but when any one of them, or several of them, increase enough to significantly raise water’s conductivity beyond a certain point, it’s usually bad for the organisms in that body of water.

            Aqueous conductivity is measured in microsiemens per cubic centimeter (uS/cm2). The conductivity of a typical healthy stream will be between 150 and 500 uS/cm2. Conductivity over 500 uS/cm2 will lead to ecological impairment and a loss of biological diversity. High conductivity will also mean that the water in the stream is not fit for human consumption.

            There is some good science associating mountaintop mining with increasing conductivity in nearby streams. Also, Ken Ward at the Charleston Gazette has much more about this story. Needless to say, this sort of ruling should have happened decades ago, before hundreds of mountains were sacrificed for the coal companies, but this is still good news.

ALEC's Efforts to Harpoon EPA Limits on CO2

I’m never surprised when I read news like this. Using documents obtained from the American Legislative Council (ALEC), the Guardian has found a coordinated effort by the GOP and big business to harpoon the EPA’s ability to regulate greenhouse gasses.

            ALEC, which is funded in large part by the coal company Peabody Energy and the Koch brothers, and which holds a strong stance against the EPA, has been encouraging state attorneys general to bring lawsuits against new EPA regulations that restrict emissions from power plants. ALEC encouraged legislators to perform similar lobbying of governors and state attorneys general. The organization also got legislation into about a dozen state houses that would impinge on the efforts of the EPA to reduce carbon emissions.

            The new rules for power plant emissions came out last year. In a somewhat surprising move this week, the Supreme Court ruled that the EPA has the authority to enforce a similar rule that protects downwind states from the pollution caused by power plants in other states.

            Considering all the big money and the organized effort against the EPA and any program to reduce the amount of carbon that we pump into the atmosphere, it amazes me that any progress can occur. But it does. There may be hope.

Ohio, a Fracking Dumping Ground, Now Wonders About the Safety of Its Drinking Water

I guess that the state of Ohio is having one of those “Well, duh!” moments, when the folks there realize that expansive environmental degradation is not just the domain of their neighbors across the river in West Virginia.

            As with my last post that ended with West Virginia Senate Majority Leader John Unger warning that the toxic spill that deprived 300,000 residents of his state of basic drinking water could, if ignored, serve as a harbinger to the rest of the country. Through the lax enforcement of regulation and even the absence of regulation other parts of the country could have poisoned water pouring out of their taps as well.

            Just as West Virginia leads the country in mountaintop removal, Ohio leads the country in being a dumping ground for fracking waste. Fracking requires tons and tons of water, which becomes contaminated because of the chemicals used in the fracking process. Because Ohio is blessed, or cursed depending on your point of view, with unique rock layers that are ideal for disposing of fracking waste, the Buckeye State is home to over 200 injection wells where hydraulic fracturing waste is pumped deep underground, sometimes as deep as 5,000 feet.

            With so many West Virginians out of water for so long, a number of Ohioans are now asking how safe is it to pump tons and tons of waste under the rocks that provide their groundwater. A major spill in a river is a disaster, but the flow of the water cleanses the river within weeks or months. On the other hand, once groundwater is contaminated, it could be decades or even centuries before the contaminants make their way from an aquifer.

            Just as it seems obvious, now, that letting a large tank filled with a toxin to sit next to a major water source was a bad idea, you kind of wonder why weren’t some Ohioans a little leery of letting folks pump toxic waste into the rocks under their state in the first place.

Three Months On West Virginia Still Suffers From Troubled Waters

Three months on some West Virginians still aren't drinking the water.

Sorry to have dropped the ball on this blog for a while. There has been plenty to write about, but I’ve been tied up with a few things lately. I promise to get back to a more regular schedule with my posts here.

            The story that I’ve been following a great deal lately is the toxic spill in West Virginia’s Elk River that occurred in January of this year. Though the spill happened almost exactly three months ago, apparently there are still folks who are staying away from their tap water, and some folks are complaining that the telltale licorice smell still lingers in the water coming from their taps. The levels of the 4-methylcyclohexane methanol have dropped in the drinking water. The highest level of the chemical in water tested in a ten-home pilot project was found to be 6.1 parts per billion, much lower than the Center For Disease Control’s somewhat arbitrary threshold of 1000 parts per billion.

            It seems as though some members of the national press are keeping an eye on the water problems in the Kanawha Valley. I heard this story on Here and Now. Interviewed for the story is Rahul Gupta. The Kanawha-Charleston health director said that there may now be evidence pointing to long-standing low levels of MCHM being present in the drinking water of the Kanawha Valley. As he said, there is no research on what this chemical might do to people who are exposed to small amounts of it over long periods of time.

And the spill made the pages of the New Yorker. Evan Osnos, who years ago worked as a photojournalist in Clarksburg, West Virginia, my hometown, delves into the history of the coal companies and the grip that they have on the politics of the Mountain State. In his piece Osnos suggests that the rise of the GOP in West Virginia, a very traditional Democratic stronghold, is not a good trend. Although the anti-environmental rhetoric of the GOP and that party’s willingness to slash and burn environmental and health regulations would seem to support what he has to say, I think things are bad in my home state no matter which party occupies the state house or the governor’s mansion. The lack of regulatory control over the coal companies and the chemical industries goes back through the administrations of governors Joe Manchin and Jay Rockefeller, both Democrats.

            Democrats and Republicans both bear some of the blame for the state of affairs in West Virginia; the same can be said of the electorate that sends these politicians into office. Ultimately, however, the coal companies and the chemical industry in West Virginia are responsible for the polluted waters and sickened people. From the time Appalachian children attend grammar school, where the coal industry has developed and, with the blessing of the educational establishment, inserted into Appalachian schools’ curricula to indoctrinate students and turn them into coal industry loving adults, through the industry’s campaign against the president and environmental regulation in the guise of fighting Obama’s “war on coal,” King Coal and the chemical companies influence enough of the electorate to get coal-friendly politicians into office. Their influence is not total. Recent polling indicates that mountaintop removal remains unpopular in West Virginia. Even still, you don’t have to convince every voter, just enough to make the difference to get your preferred candidate into office. And once in office, no matter what a state senator or governor may believe personally, they are barraged with the money and lobbying of the industries that control West Virginia.

            Without footage of floodwaters or images of flattened houses, most of the national press moved on from the story of West Virginians and their water problems. But Osnos quotes West Virginia Senate Majority Leader John Unger pointing out why this toxic spill deserves the attention of the rest of the country, “Martin Luther King said that injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. Why should anybody care about what goes on in West Virginia? Because it’s the canary in the mineshaft. If you ignore it in West Virginia, it’s coming, it’s going to continue to build, and the issue is: Should our country have the debate about our rights to the very basic infrastructure that sustains us? Or should we continue to ignore it?”