Two days of public hearings began today in Pittsburgh on proposed rules by the EPA that would set
more stringent standards for the emissions of CO2 from coal-burning power
plants. These rules are being proposed to stave off global warming. Similar
hearings were held earlier this week in Atlanta, Denver, and Washington, D.C.,
but these hearings in Pittsburgh, right in the middle of the coal-rich
Appalachians, attracted a great deal of attention from the coal industry and
its political supporters.
Yesterday
the coal industry held a rally. Called an affordable electricity and energy
jobs rally, the gathering included Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett, West
Virginia Governor Earl Ray Tomblin, and labor leaders. The rally was attended
by hundreds of West Virginia coal miners.
Tomblin,
an unabashed supporter of the coal industry, spoke at the rally in support of
the coal companies and against the proposed new power plant rules. Now, before
going much further, let me give credit to Tomblin, who, as he spoke at this
rally, did not deny the connection between burning coal and warming up the
world. He did, however, have a pretty harsh critique of the Environmental Protection Agency. He described
the proposed carbon rules as “unreasonable restrictions” and “ideological policies” that would
eliminate jobs in the coal region. He also used a race-to-the-bottom argument
that reducing the emissions of U.S. power plants would raise electricity rates
and send manufacturers overseas to countries that don’t govern their power
production so well or don’t govern it at all.
I
don’t claim that Tomblin or other politicians’ concern for jobs is insincere.
It is nonetheless interesting to me how well their concern for the employment
of their constituents dovetails with the concerns of industry. Back when the auto industry and the
steel industry decided to move operations overseas and allow America’s
industrial belt to crumble and turn into the rust belt I don’t recall a great
number of politicians pontificating on the concern to keep Detroiters or
Pittsburghers in their jobs.
As I said above, I
give credit to Tomblin for not denying climate change. And I guess in a weird
way I have to give credit to Nick Casey, the former chairman of West Virginia’s
Democratic Party who is now running for Congress. He doesn’t deny climate change
either. But in a meeting with some of West Virginia’s largest lobbying groups
he said that global warming is not a problem to be addressed by West
Virginians. “It’s not our problem,” he said, because global warming is an
international issue.
Excuse
me, I hope the quality of my writing doesn’t suffer as I keep pounding at the
keyboard, but right now my head is spinning. Nick Casey is saying global
warming is not a West Virginia problem because the problem belongs to the whole
world. Well, well, well. I’m not even sure where to start with this. It is true
that as the seas rise and the oceans grow more and more acidic West Virginia
will not be immediately affected. The amount of warming that the Mountain State
experiences may not be as great as what is expected in other places. So Casey
could be right that global warming may not be a big problem for West Virginia.
But, as a state with a lot of coal and natural gas, it is, undeniably, their responsibility.
And
my head still spins.
No comments:
Post a Comment