Tuesday, September 25, 2012

Rachel Carson's Silent Spring at 50: Why This Book Inspired and Where We Stand Today



Rachel Carson Postage Stamp issued in 1981

In the papers and scattered on the Internet folks are taking note of the 50th anniversary of the publication of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring. As every introductory paragraph of every article or feature about the book has the phrase “inspired the modern environmental movement” or something of that nature, I’d like to take a moment to consider why this book created the fervor that it did and where we presently stand because of Carson and her book.
Carson targeted the use of pesticides, particularly DDT, in her book. Most Americans could not see the harmful effects from the misuse of these substances. They could not witness the cracking of the DDT weakened eggshells of pelicans and eagles and their subsequent empty nests, nor were most of the people living in this country privy to the topsy-turvy ecological landscapes created by pesticides.
            But Americans could bear witness to the harm industrialization caused their environments. And a large number of folks felt that things were getting worse. In 1955 Los Angeles declared its first smog alert. In the sixties and seventies these alerts became more frequent.[i] Beaches of Lake Erie that people had enjoyed for decades were closed because of pollution, and commercial fishing in that body of water had been severely impaired.[ii] Other lakes and rivers were increasingly fouled with industrial waste and poorly treated sewage.
            Though the specifics of the book differed from people’s everyday experiences, the central leitmotif of Silent Spring—that as far as Mother Nature was concerned something was out of whack and that we were, because of our carelessness and hubris in matters of the environment, the cause of that out of whackness—resonated with the American People.
            In many ways our environmental problems have increased since the time of Silent Spring. Mountaintop removal has destroyed over 500 mountains of Appalachia, as well as destroying communities and ruining the health of many Appalachians.  Oil spills still kill fish and waterfowl. These and other problems plague us and our environment despite the environmental movement and the workings of our government that Silent Spring inspired, such as the Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, NEPA, and the EPA.
            Carson is often compared to Harriet Beecher Stowe, whose book, Uncle Tom’s Cabin, stirred antislavery sentiments and prepared the way for the Civil War and emancipation. I often think that as far as environmental awareness, we are living through a time comparable to the hundred years after the Civil War. Just as the sons and daughters, grandsons and daughters, of freed slaves were technically emancipated yet still enslaved by discrimination, segregation, and Jim Crow, we are environmentally safeguarded by the environmental laws of the early seventies yet still enslaved by the same mindset of hubris and carelessness that saw the spraying of hundreds of tons of DDT and other pesticides across field and forest that Carson addressed in Silent Spring.
            With anti-environmentalism threatening the 50 year legacy left by Silent Spring, it would be easy to despair. But we can also look forward as well. Like the struggle of civil rights 50 years ago, perhaps we are only beginning our work of environmentalism. I remain hopeful.




[i] Chronology of California History: New Dreams 1945 to 1964 n.d. web 9/25/12
[ii] Hill, Gladwin. “Fight to Save an Ailing Lake Erie Nears the Crisis.” New York Times June 20, 1965: pg 50 print

Friday, September 7, 2012

President Obama Accepts Reality During His Acceptance Speech: So Why Am I Not Campaigning For Him?


Delivered as an obvious rebuke to the flippant dismissal that Romney gave the topic of climate change during the GOP convention, President Obama had this to say about a warming planet during his acceptance speech.



Well, three cheers! It’s good to hear a note of reality during a party convention speech. But as Obama talks the talk, please excuse me for being skeptical about our president walking the walk.
When he ran for president in 2008, Obama and his campaign promised “swift and comprehensive action to combat global climate change.”[i] Yet the tack on global warming that the administration took after gaining office was often tepid and cautious. During those first hundred days of the new administration, when Democrats controlled the House, Senate, and Oval Office, the administration more or less threw cold water on comprehensive legislation introduced to the House that would have capped greenhouse gasses.[ii] Also, for the International Climate Conference in Copenhagen, Obama waited until the last day to show up.[iii]
            Perhaps I have been expecting too much. After all, it’s impossible to describe the opposition that the GOP has presented to advancing any progress on reducing greenhouse gasses. And opposition on this issue also extends to the president’s own party.[iv] In his favor I do have to give Obama credit for raising standards for gas mileage for American cars. He didn’t need Congress for that.
Obviously, I can have no truck with a candidate who is dismissive of the dangers of rising seas and a planet that is wrapping itself more thickly in the thermal insulation of CO2, as Governor Romney did last week. I just wish that, campaign speeches and acceptance speeches aside, I could vote to reelect a president who had done more to keep the globe from getting hotter and hotter.



[i] Broder, John M. “Obama, Who Vowed Rapid Action on Climate Change, Turns More Cautious.” New York Times April 11, 2009
[ii] ibid
[iii] Broder, John M. “Obama Shifts His Visit to Last Day of Climate Conference.” New York Times December 5, 2009
[iv] Broder, John M. “Climate Bill Threatened by Senators.” New York Times August 7, 2009